Part
3
The Excavation
Begins
t
is noteworthy that these low burial mounds would possibly still remain
largely undisturbed today if it were not for the enthusiasm of the landowner.
In 1938 - a Mrs Edith Pretty, inspired by an earlier archaeological trip
to Egypt returned with a curiosity about the barrows that were on her land.
She realised that there was a possibility that they held something that
may be historically interesting. Little did she know that it would eventually
turn out to be one of the most important archaeological finds made in England
of early Saxon treasure and relics.
Who Can Help
Me?
n
the first half of 1938, Edith Pretty must have asked the above question
to herself a number of times. She eventually contacted the curator of the
Ipswich museum. Guy Maynard, the curator listened to Mrs Pretty and decided
to refer her to an individual called Basil Brown. Basil Brown was an archaeologist
and familiar with the area. Due to the particularly sandy soil at the site,
it was important that any archaeological dig carried out was with care
and caution - which was sensible - as it turned out later to be. Basil
brown met with Mrs Pretty and discussed the task and the complications
of removing tons of sandy soil. Obviously not a one-man operation. Mrs
Pretty volunteered her gardener named - John Jacobs and gamekeeper - William
Spooner.

Sutton
Hoo
interpretation. Barrow one is in the foreground and the natural grassy
terrain has been removed to give a better impression of their form.
|
Where Shall We
Start?
ny
archaeologist likes to start on an undisturbed site. Mrs Pretty on the
other hand wanted Basil Brown to begin his excavations on the largest mound.
Basil was not too keen on this idea because it had shown signs of disturbance.
He eventually persuaded Mrs Pretty, who must have bowed to his experience,
that barrow 3 would be the best place. The dig commenced on the 20th
June 1938.
Barrow Three
ue
to the lack of disturbance and the fact that grave robbing was not the
sole preserve to the pyramids of Egypt, the signs of post construction
tampering were absent. The task confronting Basil brown and his two recruited
helpers was enormous. Mound or barrow 3 was 25 metres wide and about 1.5
metres high. Basil decided to start on the west side and cut an exploratory
trench in an easterly direction. His trench was about a metre and a half
wide and he slowly progressed towards the centre of the mound. Almost at
the centre, he noticed a that there were signs of excavation that were
not similar to the soil he had removed. His pulse must have raced at this
discovery. His first priority was to estimate the scale of his find. He
decided to excavate a 3 metre square in the centre. Once the trench over-spill
had been removed - Brown began to dig below ground level. Within 2 metres,
he came across what looked like an oak plank or platter almost 2 metres
long by about half a metre wide. This decayed plank contained the remains
of a human being and a horse. Both cremated bodies were together on the
platter. This man's horse would have been sacrificed after his death. Other
Bone shards were also found which were possibly from the decoration of
the man's possessions. Also buried with him was a jug and throwing axe
called a fransisca. Throwing axes were short handled and heavily weighted
at the blade end. Basil brown must have become inspired by his discovery
because he moved directly on to barrow two.

Another
interpretation showing the full fifteen mounds to approximate scale. This
is possibly how the Sutton Hoo site would of looked around the time of
their construction. Erosion and other soil movements over the centuries
have now made them flatter than they were originally. Barrow 1 is in the
foreground.
|
Barrow Two
his
excavation which was sponsored by Mrs Edith Pretty makes it all the more
surprising that he decided to attempt mound 3 instead of mound 1 that Mrs
Pretty originally indicated her preference for. However the conversation
went between the two, he must have persuaded her that mound 2 was more
likely to uncover objects of interest than the obviously disturbed mound
1. What was more surprising was that this barrow appeared more disturbed
than mound 1. Basil Browns reasons for choosing this mound are not clear
but the excavation began. With the same helpers, he began on the east side
this time and dug his trench towards the west. It is interesting to speculate
why Basil Brown dug in this direction. Was it to do with the light and
the sun position or did he perceive the idea that there could possibly
be something buried that warranted digging in this direction? This time
his trench was slightly wider than in mound 3, but his technique was the
same. This mound was slightly wider and higher than mound 2 and measured
28 metres wide by approximately 2.5 metres high. After removing 6 metres
of soil, he came across his first sign of interest. A patch of discoloured
soil that could possibly have been caused by fire. This may have been from
the original constructors of the barrow. Moving further towards the centre,
he made his first real discovery. Two iron nails or rivet like pins were
recovered. It probably didn't take Basil Brown long to realise what these
rivets could possibly mean. Continuing on, Brown found more rivets in the
exploratory trench. He also realised that to find these rivets where they
were indicated that considerable tampering had taken place at a later date.
He continued towards the centre. Basil Brown became disappointed when he
found its contents ransacked. He recovered bits and pieces of what would
have been vital evidence for our understanding of these people if only
they had been left undisturbed. What was found was of interest nonetheless.
The Saxon grave was devoid of its contents. Most of the fragments that
remained indicated that the grave robbing operation was very badly implemented
from the onset and without due care and attention or respect for the incumbent
who was now missing. The most important finds in mound 2 were small shield
adornments made of gilt and silver gilt remains that were used to decorate
the drinking horns used at the time. A blue glass jar and a couple of blades
made of iron and other small items that would have been used to decorate
other biodegradable material that had since rotted to nothing.
Barrow Four
asil
brown must have been getting exhausted by his labours at this point. Undaunted,
he set to work on mound 4. this was the smallest mound excavated so far
and measured 20 metres wide by about 1 metre or so high. It was getting
late in the year to consider the prospect of barrow 1 He decided to conclude
with this mound. Heavily pock-marked with rabbit burrows, he used the same
technique as the other two. This was the most disappointing of the three
he had excavated. Again, he found cremated bone and some material of superior
quality that indicated that the incumbent may have been of high standing.
Other fragments found were of bronze. Further studies of the bones show
that they were of a young adult and those of a horse. When a high ranking
Saxon dies, it appears that so does everything else he owns.
No more - after
four
o
more excavations were carried out that year. The clouds of war were inextricably
heading England's way. The largest mound was yet to be attempted. Barrow
1 would have to wait.
I wonder when
one - if ever
asil
Browns work that year was important for our understanding of the burial
culture of high status Saxons. He must have been mortified by the ransacking
of all three mounds. It would have been easy to understand his interest
waning after the work he had put in to see the vandalism inflicted on these
graves' hundreds of years ago. Even though many of the contents were missing,
the fragments that remained helped us understand those times a little better.
The impending war clouds, soon to descend in 1939, left doubts as to when
barrow 1 would be attempted.
|